P: Discussions on my “Evolution of Human Skin: It’s Impossible” video:

    • lec0621 

      You are suffering the delusion that natural election of traits is determined by the organism. Thanks for playing. Why don’t you evolve wings and fly away?

      Reply ·
    • stevebee92653 

      stevebee92653 

      Gad, I wish I could. Maybe I’ll start by running up some inclined planes? Think that’ll help? Or maybe fall out of some trees.

      Reply · in reply to lec0621 
    • lec0621 

      lec0621 

      Why not get an education? That works for most humans.

      Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
    • stevebee92653 

      stevebee92653 

      Now there’s a good idea. I’ll get an education after I run up inclined planes or fall out of some trees and get my wings. Thanks!

      Reply · in reply to lec0621 
    • lec0621 

      lec0621 

      It might work. You certainly wouldn’t wind up any more ignorant that you are right now.

      You do know that, if the drivel you’ve posted had any scientific merit, you’d be uber-rich right now. Submit it to peer review and become famous as the self-aggrandizing layman who did what scientists haven’t been able to do in a hundred years…disprove evolution. See, that’s how scientists get famous and rich..coming up with something better. Go for it. I’ll get popcorn.

      Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
    • stevebee92653 

      stevebee92653 

      You are nothing but an indoctrinated over-committed cloned fool. Just like all of your fellow believers. Your writing is pure copy paste. Don’t you get embarrassed? Do you know of any evolution believers that can think on their own, and not copy each other ad infinitum? If you do, let me know. I haven’t found one yet.

      Reply · in reply to lec0621 
    • lec0621 

      lec0621 

      Funny. I didn’t cut and paste anything I sent you. So, that’s one wrong. What’s so ironic is that a man with no evidence behind his hypothesis calls other people “indoctrinated fools”. How does that happen?

      As far as indoctrinated fool, I am a scientist and I study nature for a living. Yup, what you believe is your god’s creation contradicts everything you say. Wonder who’s wrong here, huh? Someone with reams of data or someone who won’t put his statements up for scrutiny.

      Funny.

      Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
    • stevebee92653 

      stevebee92653 

      Your brain is cut and paste.You automatically think I am religious.That is preprogrammed into your brain. You have no data about how human skin came to be, another proof of your indoctrination over good science.You are no scientist. Scientists question; like I do and did. You believe without evidence, which makes you not a scientist but a gullible fool who thinks you’re a scientist. You’re a fake that has been trained to believe by repetitive brainwashing. You have no idea, which is typical. YUP

      Reply · in reply to lec0621 
    • wong lowang 

    lec0621

  • I’ve already challenged you, Mr. stevebee, to subject your hypothesis to peer review. You have spurned that process. If you feel you have found something – anything- that directly or indirectly proves that the Theory of Evolution is false, subject it to tthat process. That is the mechanism that modern science self-corrects.

    You are, apparently, unwilling to do so. You have not given a reason. If I can help, I will do so. Why not do this?

    Reply ·
  • stevebee92653 

    stevebee92653 

    OK here is my proof and my paper:

    Preface: Evolution science cannot come up with any possible scenario for how tubes formed.

    Body: Humans have over 65,000 miles of tubes (blood vessels) in their bodies.

    Conclusion: Evolution science cannot come up with any possible scenario for how tubes formed. Therefore evolution did not make tubes or any entity.

    Please take my paper to any peer review board of your choice. You will never believe mine, and you said you will help. Report back.

    Reply · in reply to lec0621 
  • lec0621 

    lec0621 

    Please provide the paper. I disagree with your premise but, if you have such evidence, I will help present it. Please provide the paper.

    I have no idea what you’ve been told to expect but that is not a paper. That’s merely your hypothesis and a restatement of your hypothesis with no evidence whatsoever.
  • The publication criteria at Nature are published on the web at nature.com.

    Have any facts that hereditary changes cannot account for “tubes”? Anything that supports?

  • Mine IS a paper, and not a hypothesis but a fact. You sit yourself down and draw out the microsteps evolution would need to form the first tubes. And if you can’t, which will be the case, this case is closed. My paper is valid. Please help me and submit it. If you DO actually come up with a scenario, I will sure be interested. Remember, thinking IS necessary. Since you have forfeited that part of your being to Charles, you won’t be able to.

  • Sorry, what you have is a hypothesis and no reputable science journal would publish it, even if it were true. You at least would have to do an exhaustive literature review to establish that your claim was true at the time of publication. You have not done so.

    Your statement isn’t coherent anyway. You seem to lack an understanding of the Theory of Evolutiion. Evolution does not make tubes, bones or any other structure. Yes, thinking is necessary, once you know the basics.

  • stevebee92653 

    stevebee92653 

    You have the hypothesis, not me. I say your hypothesis is pure BS; mine isn’t a hypothesis. It’s pure fact. You need to “prove”, not me.

    Evo doesn’t make bones, or tubes? What or who did? I can’t wait to hear. I still want to know how your pencil drawing of the formation of tubes came out. Well?

    Then you come out with your pre-programmed brain stuff: “Your statement isn’t coherent anyway. You seem to lack an understanding of the Theory of Evolution.” Right on schedule. Good job!

  • lec0621 

    lec0621 

    Actually, quite the reverse. My comments are based on a scientific theory and that beats anything you can construct from thin air. You’re right, you don’t even have a hypothesis.

    I’m astonished that someone who does not know what a theory says is claiming to have falsified it. Where did you get your “understanding” of the ToE? You don’t know that evolution is a process and not a mechamism?

    Wonder why no one takes you seriously? I don’t.

    Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
  • stevebee92653 

    stevebee92653 

    You don’t take me seriously? Then why are you here?

    You said evo didn’t make tubes and bones, and when I asked you what did, you skipped out. So c’mon. What made tubes and bones? I gotta know.

    Did you finish your drawing on how tubes came in to existence? I’m really excited about that one too. From someone who knows everything; you! I sure wish I knew everything like you do.

    Reply · in reply to lec0621 
  • lec0621 

    lec0621 

    I’m here because I saw a few minutes of your off-the-wall video. To quote Wolfgang Pauli, “It’s not even wrong!”

    So, I decided to engage you to see if there was any substance behind your claims. So there’s none. Not really surprised. I am surprised by your level of ignorance on this subject, though.

    What makes “tubes” and bones? Really, crack open an intro bio book. It’s all in there and it’s not the ToE. “Tubes” would be around with or without evolution.

    Sux 2 B U.

    Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
  • stevebee92653 

    stevebee92653 

    When was your brain programmed? Did it hurt when they did it? Do you remember? Did you feel “different” when you woke up? And, gee, you’re not going to tell me how tubes and bones came into existence? Shucks. I was really excited to hear. I have beyond a masters in biology, and I never saw that one in any biology book. I bet your trainers gave you special “indoctrinates” versions of biology books with that special stuff in it. Well, you have been very entertaining, but now you are beyond boring. Bye

    Reply · in reply to lec0621 
  • stevebee92653 

    stevebee92653 

    Re: “Tubes” would be around with or without evolution.”

    Proof that YOU don’t “understand” your own belief system. Charles would roll over in his grave if he heard this answer. It’s pure blasphemy! Straight to evo-hell with you!

    • yarpen800 

      Go back to school, kid. This is no place for your ignorance.

      Reply · in reply to stevebee92653
      • stevebee92653 

        stevebee92653 

        This is top notch commenting! Are you always this brilliant? Or am I the only lucky one to get such intelligent commenting from you?

        Reply · in reply to yarpen800 
    • MoveOrder 

      MoveOrder 

      This has to be a joke. One minute on Google and you have all the answers.

      Ever wondered why some horses need blanket, they have fur, right?

      Do you understand why horses covered with blankets get depended upon them?
    • Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
    • stevebee92653 

      stevebee92653 

      No I don’t understand why horses covered with blankets get depended upon them.

      Reply · in reply to MoveOrder 
    • MoveOrder 

      MoveOrder 1 week ago

      They produce less fur.

      Reply · in reply to stevebee92653 
    • image.png

      stevebee92653 

      Ah!

      Reply · in reply to MoveOrder 
    • lec0621 
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: