1d: Sample of Awful Evo-Comments
This is a good sampling of evo-comments that I consider a waste of time and space. Cadman2300, a member of www.rationalskepticism.org says he saw many comments before they were deleted, and feels they are extremely intelligent and well written. Universally, of course. Not a bad one in the group. Of course. They were written by fellow evolutionauts, who can do no wrong. A sample of his criticism of me that he wrote on rationalskepticism.org on the fact that I screen comments:
“Liar-liar, pants on fire.
Pictures of Crocoducks and life evolving from a rock?
His pants aren’t on fire anymore. Now they’re nothing but smoking ash.”
And of course the ever present and tiresome attack on my education. And “pants on fire”? How does one respond to that? Don’t these guys ever realize when their arguments get overused and trite:
“A lot of people are skeptical about your educational background. Should we all just ignore that and pretend that you have proper training necessary to evaluate any and all evidence? I don’t think so.”
“Maybe you would have a case against evolution if you presented something other then some BS about Tyrannosaur arms, teeth fitting together, and the never-ending accusation about how anyone who disagrees with you is “indoctrinated”.
There are over 36 pages on this blog. And hundreds of points I make on why evolution doesn’t explain the designs of nature. These evolutionauts have blinders on. Maybe if Cadman2300 actually read the blog, or even some of it, he would realize that the T. Rex arms are just one “teensy tiny step in the evolution” of the thinking of stevebee when he evolved from evoutionaut to evo-denier.
I would say that anyone who poses himself as good critic of comments, like Cadman2300 does, should be able to write better comments than this. And he wonders why I began screening. Sorry Cadman2300, I don’t want to waste any more time with this kind of trash. Any evolutionaut who can write something even close to being intelligent will post.
If you read these maybe you can get a hint of why I need to screen just a bit. I am sure any evolutionaut reading this page will think these are brilliant comments. They are such a waste of time and space on my blog. Note the complete lack of any comment that has the courage to actually take on any point in this blog. They are all generalized personal attacks and religious strawmen. And note the inability to even spell check. And they so freely rag on my education?
And Here they are:
Stevie-beeten: How about this for a change of pace?
You’re over a century too late to rewrite the backbone to modern biology. You lose. Now get over it already and move on with your life. (If my stuff is so far off, why is he so concerned?)
Another feeble attempt to make it look like a clash between world-views. Evolution has acceptance by the scientific community which deals with the inescapable aspects of reality, while creationism can’t even make it past the fundamentalist ideology stage. (Evolution good. Stevebee bad. Me: not a “Creationist”)
You know Al, and Steve, there are also these amazing places called ‘Natural History Museums’. You both might want to visit such a place sometime while you’re still able. (This guy didn’t even read page 1 or 2, obviously. I BEGAN this blog because of a visit to the Field Museum in Chicago.)
ME: “Unicorny: You are indoctrinated. And boring. And repetitive.”
Unicorny: Look who’s talking. You might as well just cover your ears and sing to your self really loud.
Steve-beaten can’t formulate a proper rebuttal so all he can do is wave his hand at what’s right in front of him.
Wow, just some rehashed old arguments of incredulity. “I cant imagine how dna formed, therefore it is designed” <–So far this has been always a stump for IDiots (:
This blog only serves to reinforce creationists their loved belief in their silly unexistent god, by having the illusion that this is a genuine scientific look on evolution. The thing is that this guy is not even a scientist. If you dont understand evolutionary biology dont write a blog about it claming to refute it. This guy even knows crap about I.D. so i dont see the point. (Again, and again, I don’t do religion.)
Translation: LALALALALA-I CAN’T HEAR YOU – I’M NOT LISTENING-LALALALALA-I’D RATHER BURY MY HEAD IN THE SAND THAN DIG UP ANY EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT MY CLAIMS-LALALALALA!!
ROFL! You are just too much Stevie. Your “indoctrination” excuse and the excuses you use to justify it get shot down a million times but you clutch to them like they’re some kind of life-line or get-out-of-jail-free cards that supposedly save you from having to run an honest blog.
Seriously, we have genomes to map, cancer to beat, more transitional fossils to uncover, and a universe to better understand.
While whiny science haters have nothing better to do than play pretend-expert.
But that’s enough from me. I think I’ll head over to the Smithsonian and check out that Human Origins exhibit before some denialist whack-job tries to vandalize it.
I don’t know what history you have with Steve, but hopefully you now realize what you’re dealing with. Providing Steve with information and evidence is pointless, because his problem one of ignorance. It’s a much more basic and pernicious inability to think logically. You can see it in his responses to ADParker above, where he essentially says “I don’t have to prove black swans exist. You’re the one who says they DON’T exist, so YOU have to provide ME an example.” But for an even more priceless example, look at his “Population Paradox” page. There, he expends vast amounts of bandwidth to argue that, because something that is literally impossible didn’t happen, then this is an “incredible paradox.” He doesn’t even understand that a “paradox” would be if something was impossible, but DID happen.
Woah, a creationist vanity blog!
Were you mr dentist, ex- “evolutionist”, ever really as rational as you claim? Not on this evidence…..
Why have you set up this site at all? Is it, as someone asserted up thread, that you’ve been tossed off Dawkins’ site as a boring troll?
Wouldn ‘t surprise me, not at all.
No one cares if you feel that if evolution were true T-rex would’ve had longer arms, or that the celeocanth would have gone extinct: it’s a counterfactual, and didn’t happen. Remember, evolution is only about what is, not what might be.
Ridiculous nonsense from a man who has too much time on his hands and a mind virus he just can’t get rid of. (I bet your relatives groan whenever you get started on this nonsense!)
Why don’t you do something constructive with your retirement, raising money for the poor, for example, rather than make yourself a public fool? (This comment wouldn’t make it on RS either.)
Would you care to take a claim and publish it on a reliable site where it can be verified to see if its accurate? no.
I really didnt bother too look at the rest of the garbade on this page when i saw that no good mutations can arise and that it is invisible to us. Aparently you are too lazy to read the Greatest Show on Earth from Richard Dawkins. If you are so wonderful and smart to prove evolution wrong, then why dont you do it do the scientific community and not just to the layman who want to reinforce their silly belief of the magical sky daddy with the talking snake? which im sure it makes a whole lot more sense (:
Get a nobel prize or something if you think you are so sure. But of course we know you cant and you would make an artificial excuse that “oh evolutionists are so dogmatic that wont even allow hyper bunnies from outer dimension in his dogmatic materialistic view” Or some other B.S. Like that
Behe who is a lot more respectable than you, has had his silly calims debunked over and over about his “unlessaneble complicatedness” so much loved by IDiots.
The human inmune system. Bacterium Flagellum. Etc.
“Re. NS and RM “directly observed happening and are facts”. Sure but never observed building anything. Except in your group imaginations.”
Somebody sounds like an angry Wendy Wright, Ken Ham, and Kent Hovind all thrown together into one neat little package.
“I have read most of the major pro-ev books, and look what it did. Made me an evo-denier!”
And yet, your arguments don’t address anything at the middle-school textbook level, much less what’s in all the other books.
So far, all you’ve done is quote-mine The Blind Watchmaker.
Here’s the brutally honest Richard Dawkins on the issue:
“A belief in creationism is just as valid as a belief in evolution because neither have been proven beyond a shadow of a doubt.”
Another feeble attempt to make it look like a clash between world-views. Evolution has acceptance by the scientific community which deals with the inescapable aspects of reality, while creationism can’t even make it past the fundamentalist ideology stage.
“No atheists has ever put forth concrete proof that any species of animal, fish, bird or plant ever evolved into a new species…changed yes, but no new species…no evidence.”
Wrong again: Here’s why.
You know Al, and Steve, there are also these amazing places called ‘Natural History Museums’. You both might want to visit such a place sometime while you’re still able.
I’ve been looking at this site and then did some background on it. The best and most descriptive review I found was this:
“This is one in-on-the-scam peddler of “don’t ask, don’t
tell ID.” One who is on a mission to save the world because he thinks
the “masses” can’t handle the truth of “evillusion.” Either that, or
he just likes selling snake oil. ”
Google Chat Group.
I can’t really put it better than that. I’m dumbfounded by the stupidity and I really wonder why people bother writing long winded replies because he just ignores them. A waste of time for a waste of space-It would be different if he had something to say. [[[ yawn ]]]